Get e-mail updates when this information changes. Sign up to Receive E-mail Updates     Click to subscribe to the Supreme Court of Ohio Opinion Summaries RSS Feed Subscribe to This Feed     Upcoming Cases

Greenville Attorney Suspended

2009-0719.  Disciplinary Counsel v. Rohrer, Slip Opinion No. 2009-Ohio-5930.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 08-066.  David A. Rohrer, Attorney Registration No. 0042428, is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2009/2009-Ohio-5930.pdf Adobe PDF Link opens new window.

Requires Adobe Flash Player. View oral argument video of this case.

(Nov. 17, 2009) The Supreme Court of Ohio today suspended the license of Greenville attorney David A. Rohrer for six months for deliberately violating a court order and then misrepresenting to the court his responsibility for that misconduct.

The Court adopted findings by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances & Discipline that Rohrer, while serving as appointed defense counsel in a case involving a child accused of setting a fire that killed five people, violated a “gag” order imposed by the trial court by having a member of his office staff deliver a copy of a motion he had filed in the case to the Darke County Daily Advocate newspaper.  At a subsequent hearing after the newspaper published a story based on the “leaked” document, Rohrer made misleading statements to the court indicating that he may have been responsible for a “misunderstanding” that resulted in his staff’s disclosure of the motion, but that he had not deliberately instructed his staff to violate the gag order.

The court agreed with the board’s findings that Rohrer’s conduct violated the state attorney discipline rules that prohibit knowingly making  a false statement to a tribunal, knowingly disobeying a rule or order of a court, engaging in conduct that reflects adversely on an attorney’s fitness to practice law, engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, and engaging in conduct that involves fraud, deceit, dishonesty or misrepresentation. 

While the disciplinary board recommended that Rohrer’s license be suspended for six months with the full term stayed on conditions, the Court voted 7-0 that Rohrer’s deliberate false statements to the court and other aggravating factors in the case merited an actual six-month suspension from practice.

Contacts
Jonathan E. Coughlan, 614.461.0256, for the Office of Disciplinary Counsel.

Geoffrey Stern, 614.462.5400, for David Rohrer.

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion released by the Court, but only for those cases considered noteworthy or of great public interest. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of Court opinions. The full text of this and other Court opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions. In the Full Text search box, enter the eight-digit case number at the top of this summary and click "Submit."

Requires Adobe Flash Player. Requires the free Adobe Flash Player.
View system requirements, download instructions, and download the free Adobe Flash Player.