On Tuesday, July 17, 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio launched an expanded news program – Court News Ohio – that features stories about the Ohio judicial system. This archived page on the Supreme Court’s website only displays case summaries that occurred before that date. Cases that were summarized on July 17 and thereafter can be found at www.courtnewsohio.gov.

Upcoming Cases

Thursday, June 21, 2012

2011-1070. State v. Niesen-Pennycuff, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-2730.
Warren App. No. CA2010-11-112, 2011-Ohio-2704.  Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Lanzinger, J., concurs in judgment only.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2012/2012-Ohio-2730.pdf
Summary: When Defendant Completes Intervention Program, Court May Seal Record Immediately Or Impose Waiting Period

2011-1529.  1495 Jaeger L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-2680.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2009-V-2894.  Decision affirmed.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2012/2012-Ohio-2680.pdf

2012-0133. State ex rel. Doe v. Capper, Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-2686.
In Prohibition.  Writ granted.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2012/2012-Ohio-2686.pdf

2012-0176.  State ex rel. Sizemore v. Ohio Veterinary Med. Licensing Bd., Slip Opinion No. 2012-Ohio-2725.
Franklin App. No. 11AP-298, 2012-Ohio-63.  Judgment affirmed.
O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur.
Opinion: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2012/2012-Ohio-2725.pdf

Please note: Opinion summaries are prepared by the Office of Public Information for the general public and news media. Opinion summaries are not prepared for every opinion released by the Court, but only for those cases considered noteworthy or of great public interest. Opinion summaries are not to be considered as official headnotes or syllabi of Court opinions. The full text of this and other Court opinions from 1992 to the present are available online from the Reporter of Decisions. In the Full Text search box, enter the eight-digit case number at the top of this summary and click "Submit."

Adobe PDF PDF files may be viewed, printed, and searched using the free Acrobat® Reader
Acrobat Reader is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.