Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 101 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Reyes CA2015-06-113, CA2015-06-114, CA2015-06-115Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying noncitizen criminal defendant's R.C. 2943.031 motion to withdraw his guilty pleas because the motion was untimely filed. HendricksonButler 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2771
State v. Dees CA2015-09-166Municipal court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to convict defendant of domestic violence where the complaint was neither signed nor made under oath, and was thus invalid under Crim.R. 3.M. PowellButler 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2772
In re J.L.M. CA2015-11-206, CA2015-12-209, CA2015-12-210, CA2015-12-211The facts that mother and children love each other and are bonded and the children are bonded with each other and wish to be reunited with mother, are heavily outweighed, under the circumstances of this case, by the factors in R.C. 2151.414(D)(1) that support granting child services agency permanent custody, including mother failed to effectively address her drug addiction and failed to attain and maintain stable housing and a stable source of income.PiperButler 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2773
In re E.C. CA2016-01-014Juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in denying a parent's motion to continue a hearing regarding the permanent custody of their child when child had been in the custody of the children services agency for several months and the parent contributed to the circumstances giving rise to the request. RinglandButler 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2774
In re K.R. CA2015-06-049The trial court's decision designating appellee residential parent and legal custodian was not an abuse of discretion nor against the manifest weight of the evidence where both parties were loving parents who were able to provide for their minor daughter's needs. In addition, allowing guardian ad litem to cross-examine witnesses was not error where guardian ad litem was appointed to provide representation for the minor child and appellant did not object.S. PowellClermont 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2775
Barrett v. Wilmington CA2015-02-006Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the city where it was undisputed that the city property was designated as a street for public use and appellant failed to fence the disputed property for purposes of providing notice to the public entity. RinglandClinton 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2776
State v. Jones CA2015-05-012Trial court did not err in refusing request made by defendant charged with domestic violence with two priors to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of disorderly conduct since, the evidence presented, even when looked at in a light most favorable to defendant, was insufficient to allow the jury to reasonably reject the greater offense and find defendant guilty on the lesser included or inferior-degree offense.HendricksonFayette 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2777
State v. Robinson CA2015-05-012Anders no error.Per CuriamPreble 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2778
State v. Sekse CA2015-07-015Appellant was not entitled to a Franks hearing where he failed to make a substantial showing that the affiant was intentionally dishonest or reckless as to the honest of his affidavit.PiperPreble 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2779
Jones v. Wall CA2015-10-088The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding custody of the child to her father where there had been a change in circumstances and the child's best interest were served by appellee having custody. PiperWarren 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2780
12345678910...>>