Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the full-text search.
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Decided?
County:   What is Decided?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Decided?
Topics and Issues:   What is Decided?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 112 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Montgomery v. Montgomery 14-14-22Mother's income was not supported by sufficient documentation for modification of child support. However, trial court did not err in finding change in circumstances or that child support should have been set against father.ShawUnion 7/27/2015 7/27/2015 2015-Ohio-2976
State v. Smith 6-14-14Conviction for Illegal Cultivation in the Vicinity of a School or in the Vicinity of a Juvenile not against the weight of the evidence. Trial court did not err in overruling oral motion for suppression hearing. Rules of evidence do not apply at sentencing hearing. Trial court did not err in failing to sua sponte declare a mistrial where prosecutor did not commit misconduct.ShawHardin 7/27/2015 7/27/2015 2015-Ohio-2977
Bouillon v. Bouillon 13-14-33; 13-15-02The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting a divorce on the grounds of extreme cruelty, dividing marital property, ordering payment of temporary spousal support arrears, and ordering contempt for the fourth time.WillamowskiSeneca 7/20/2015 7/20/2015 2015-Ohio-2886
Campbell v. Schlegel 4-14-19Plaintiffs-Appellants, Tammy Campbell ("Tammy"), Kelsie Campbell ("Kelsie"), Kasey Campbell ("Kasey"), and Brian Campbell ("Brian") (collectively "the appellants"), appeal the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Defiance County, which granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee, Amy Schlegel, and denied their motion to amend their complaint. On appeal, the appellants argue that the trial court erred: (1) in finding that their amendment to the complaint would not relate back under Civ.R. 15(C); (2) in finding that the amended complaint would necessarily be barred by Civ.R. 3(A) and the applicable statute of limitations; and (3) by not allowing evidence regarding the legal representation of Amy and her family. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court's judgment.RogersDefiance 7/13/2015 7/13/2015 2015-Ohio-2808
In re D.L.S. 5-15-04, 5-15-05Judgments affirmed where the record supports the trial court's determination that the children cannot be placed with either parent within a reasonable time or should not be placed with either parent and that granting the Agency's motions for permanent custody is in the best interest of the children, and where Father has not satisfied his burden in proving his trial counsel's ineffectiveness.WillamowskiHancock 7/13/2015 7/13/2015 2015-Ohio-2809
State v. Welly 13-14-43Trial court correctly notified defendant of right to compel witnesses to testify on his behalf by using the language "summon witnesses."WillamowskiSeneca 7/6/2015 7/6/2015 2015-Ohio-2734
State v. Cross 9-14-51Conviction for Theft affirmed where no error established in jury selection and trial court did not improperly exclude evidence.ShawMarion 7/6/2015 7/6/2015 2015-Ohio-2735
Bank of Am., N.A. v. Sullivan 1-15-09The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiff-appellee's motion for default judgment the day after it was filed because a local rule, which provides a 14-day period for a party against whom a motion is filed to respond, did not apply to defendant-appellant since he did not appear in the action prior to the time that plaintiff-appellee filed its motion for default judgment.PrestonAllen 7/6/2015 7/6/2015 2015-Ohio-2736
State v. Frankart 13-15-03Conviction for "Hit-Skip" reversed for insufficient evidence. ShawSeneca 7/6/2015 7/6/2015 2015-Ohio-2737
State v. Castillo 7-14-14Defendant-Appellant, Carmel Castillo, appeals the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Henry County, finding him guilty of violating a protection order and sentencing him to 180 days in jail. On appeal, Castillo argues that the trial court erred by admitting impermissible hearsay statements into evidence and by entering a verdict that was not supported by sufficient evidence. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the trial court's judgment.RogersHenry 7/6/2015 7/6/2015 2015-Ohio-2738
12345678910...>>