| Case No. | Case Caption | Case Status | Date
Accepted | Case Issue |
|
2019-0324
|
State of Ohio/Village of Put-in-Bay
v.
Mark Mathys
and
State of Ohio/Village of Put-in-Bay
v.
Islander Inn (Timothy Niese, Sr.)
|
OPEN
|
5/15/2019
| First Proposition of Law: Because Ohio licenses vehicles for use on all public roadways in exchange for payment of an annual statutory tax on vehicles, no municipality in this state may levy an additional local tax for similar purposes—otherwise, localities could negate or attach additional strings to statewide licenses. |
|
2019-0324
|
State of Ohio/Village of Put-in-Bay
v.
Mark Mathys
and
State of Ohio/Village of Put-in-Bay
v.
Islander Inn (Timothy Niese, Sr.)
|
OPEN
|
5/15/2019
| Second Proposition of Law: Under Ohio Constitution Art. XII, Section 5a, any moneys collected from taxes levied on motor vehicles must be expended solely for a statutory purpose, therefore, a statute—not an ordinance—must enable the expenditure, and hence the exaction, of a vehicle tax. |
|
2019-0322
|
Wooster Floral & Gifts, LLC
v.
Green Thumb Floral & Garden Center, Inc.
|
OPEN
|
5/15/2019
| Proposition of Law No. 1
A competing business owner’s use of a competitor’s legally valid trade
name in a domain name to divert consumers to the competing
business’s website is a deceptive trade practice under R.C.
4165.02(A)(2) and is analyzed for likelihood of confusion at the time
the trade name is used in the domain name, not by the content on the
competing business’s website.
|
|
2019-0295
|
Joni Bey, et al.
v.
Jeffrey Rasawehr
|
OPEN
|
5/15/2019
| PROPOSITION OF LAW II
Prior Restraints on the exercise of free speech are unconstitutional and
presumptively invalid.
|
|
2019-0267
|
Total Quality Logistics, LLC
v.
JK & R Express, LLC
|
OPEN
|
5/22/2019
| A valid written indemnification agreement must be enforced as written in accordance with the intent of the parties and cannot be supplanted by the three Globe factors that are applicable only in the context of an equitable remedy. |
|
2019-0222
|
Wildcat Drilling, LLC
v.
Discovery Oil and Gas, LLC
|
OPEN
|
5/22/2019
| Proposition of Law No. 2: Contractually-negotiated indemnification clauses are not
subject to the common law Globe indemnification requirements |
|
2019-0214
|
State of Ohio
v.
Lashawna J. Blake
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
5/1/2019
| If the conditions of a community control sanction are violated or if the offender violates a law or leaves the state without the permission of the court of the offender's probation officer, the sentencing court may impose upon the violator...
(c) A prison term on the offender pursuant to section 2929.14 of the Revised Code and division (B)(3) of this section, provided that a prison term imposed under this division is subject to the following limitations, as applicable:
(I) If the prison term is imposed for any technical violation of the conditions of the community control sanction imposed for a felony of the fifth degree or for any violation of law committed while under a community control sanction imposed for such a felony that consists of a new criminal offense and that is not a felony, the prison term shall not exceed ninety days. |
|
2019-0187
|
State of Ohio
v.
Seante Jones
|
OPEN
|
4/10/2019
| “Where the state is permitted to exercise more than its allotted number of peremptory challenges in a criminal prosecution, does that circumstance constitute structural error requiring automatic reversal of a conviction, or is the defendant-appellant required to demonstrate that prejudice has resulted from the error?”
|
|
2019-0184
|
State of Ohio
v.
Mitchell Hartman
|
OPEN
|
5/1/2019
| STATE’S PROPOSITION OF LAW NO. I: In sexual assault cases, other acts
evidence offered to prove the intent of the offender or the offender’s plan is
admissible pursuant to Evid.R. 404(B) even when the identity of the offender is not
at issue |
|
2019-0182
|
State of Ohio
v.
Rogers T. Henderson
|
OPEN
|
4/17/2019
| Proposition of Law I:
A SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN SERVED IN FULL CANNOT BE INCREASED, EVEN IF THE ORIGINAL SENTENCE IS BELOW THE MINIMUM SENTENCE REQUIRED BY STATUTE |
|