| Case No. | Case Caption | Case Status | Date
Accepted | Case Issue |
|
2014-2204
|
State of Ohio
v.
Robert D. Roper
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
2/18/2015
| "May a trial court impose a no contact order on a defendant who hasalso been sentenced to [a] term of incarceration?" |
|
2014-2201
|
In the Matter of the Adoption of: H.N.R.
|
OPEN
|
1/28/2015
| Proposition of Law: The 30-day post-birth deadline for filing in the putative father registry under R.C. 3107.07(B)(1) is unconstitutional as applied to putative fathers of children surrendered for adoption after the filing deadline passes . |
|
2014-2122
|
State of Ohio
v.
Mary Marcum
|
OPEN
|
1/28/2015
| "Does the test outlined by the court in State v. Kalish apply in reviewing felony sentences after the passage of R.C. 2953.08(G)?" |
|
2014-2064
|
State of Ohio
v.
Chelsey Barry
|
OPEN
|
1/28/2015
| Whether a person who hides evidence of a crime that is unmistakable to him or her commits tampering with evidence in the absence of evidence that a victim or the public would report a crime?" |
|
2014-2036
|
In re: Daren A. Messer, Angela Messor, Debtors
Daren Messer & Angela Messer v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
|
OPEN
|
1/28/2015
| 1. Does O.R.C 1301.401 apply to all recorded mortgages in Ohio? |
|
2014-2036
|
In re: Daren A. Messer, Angela Messor, Debtors
Daren Messer & Angela Messer v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
|
OPEN
|
1/28/2015
| 2. Does O.R.C. 1301.401 act to provide constructive notice to the world of a recorded mortgage that was deficiently executed under O.R.C. 5301.01?" |
|
2014-2028
|
State of Ohio
v.
Terry Lee Martin
|
OPEN
|
1/28/2015
| "With respect to R.C. 2907.323(A)(1), which proscribes the creation or production of nudity-oriented material involving a minor, which definition of nudity applies: the statutory definition (R.C. 2907.01(H)), or the narrower definition set forth in State v. Young, 37 Ohio St.3d 249, 525 N.E.2d 1363, which requires additional elements of `lewd depiction' and `graphic focus on the genitals?" |
|
2014-1984
|
State of Ohio
v.
Chelsey Barry
|
OPEN
|
1/28/2015
| For purposes of tampering with evidence, a jury may not be instructed that it must find that a defendant knew an investigation was likely merely because she committed a crime that was "unmistakable" to her. |
|
2014-1962
|
Michael P. Onderko
v.
Sierra Lobo, Inc.
|
OPEN
|
1/28/2015
| Whether, as an element of establishing a prima facie claim for retaliatory discharge under R.C. 4123.90, plaintiff must prove that he or she suffered a workplace injury. |
|
2014-1942
|
State of Ohio
v.
Fate Burnett, II
|
OPEN
|
12/24/2014
| When a defendant is convicted of a third-degree felony OVI in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a), is the trial court authorized to sentence the offender to a maximum of five years incarceration pursuant to R.C. 4511.19(G)(1), or is it required to sentence the offender to a maximum of three years incarceration
pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(A)(3)(b)?
|
|