| Case No. | Case Caption | Case Status | Date
Accepted | Case Issue |
|
2020-1266
|
State of Ohio
v.
Edward Maddox
|
OPEN
|
12/28/2020
| "Is the constitutionality of the provisions of the Reagan Tokes Act, which allow the Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections to administratively extend a criminal defendant's prison term beyond the presumptive minimum term, ripe for review on direct appeal from sentencing, or only after the defendant has served the minimum term and been subject to extension by application of the Act?" |
|
2020-1250
|
State of Ohio
v.
Ladasia Brooks
|
OPEN
|
12/30/2020
| "Does legislation that shifts the burden of proof on self-defense to the prosecution (2018 H.B. 228. eff. March 28, 2019) apply to all subsequent trials even when the alleged offenses occurred prior to the effective date of the act?" |
|
2020-1242
|
State of Ohio
v.
Marcus Toles
|
OPEN
|
11/24/2020
| Proposition of Law: The plurality decision in State v. Gwynne does not
supplant this Court’s prior ruling in State v. Marcum that an appellate court
may modify a sentence if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that the
record does not support that sentence. |
|
2020-1232
|
State of Ohio
v.
Damon K. Downard
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
12/29/2020
| SECOND PROPOSITION OF LAW
Challenges to the Reagan Tokes Act are ripe for review on direct appeal. |
|
2020-1189
|
State of Ohio
v.
Ladasia Brooks
|
OPEN
|
12/30/2020
| Proposition of Law No. I: 2018 H.B. 228, which shifted the burden of proof on
self-defense to the prosecution, applies to all trials held after the effective date
of the act, regardless of when the alleged offenses occurred. |
|
2020-1187
|
State of Ohio
v.
Daniel J. Campbell
|
OPEN
|
12/15/2020
| First Proposition of Law: Ohio courts may constitutionally require aprobationerto
consent to warrantless searches as a condition of community contol. |
|
2020-1187
|
State of Ohio
v.
Daniel J. Campbell
|
OPEN
|
12/15/2020
| Second Proposition of Law: A probation offrcer may rely in good faith upon a
warrantless consent to search community control condition agr€ed to by a probationer. |
|
2020-1187
|
State of Ohio
v.
Daniel J. Campbell
|
OPEN
|
12/15/2020
| Third Proposition of Law: An Ohio court may not impose the remedy of exclusion to an
otherwise constitutional search based upon a violation of R.C. 2951.02 where the General
Assembly provided for no remedy. |
|
2020-1163
|
In re adoption of A.K.
|
OPEN
|
12/15/2020
| Whether In Re B.I. applies broadly such that the mere existence of any judicial order precluding a natural parent from communication with his minor children is sufficient justifiable cause to provide more than any de minimis contact with the minor for a period of at least one year under R.C. 3107.07(A). |
|
2020-1158
|
Steven Sinley
v.
Safety Controls Technology, Inc., et al.
|
OPEN
|
12/15/2020
| Appellant’s Proposition of Law No. I. The presumption of arbitrability applies
in R.C. 2711.03 and 9 U.S.C. § 3 motions to compel arbitral resolution of statutory
claims. Arbitration should not be denied unless it may be said with positive
assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that
covers the asserted dispute. |
|