| Case No. | Case Caption | Case Status | Date
Accepted | Case Issue |
|
2020-0826
|
State of Ohio v. Brooke Jones
|
OPEN
|
8/19/2020
| “Does the original sentencing court have the authority, whether notice is provided or not, to impose a community control violation sentence to run consecutively to the second sentence, or is that authority vested exclusively in the second sentencing court?” |
|
2020-0823
|
State of Ohio ex rel. Jay Johnstone
v.
City of Cincinnati
|
OPEN
|
9/15/2020
| Proposition of Law No. I: The Cincinnati Civil Service Commission did not abuse its discretion in waiving the two year time-in-grade requirement for the 2016 police captain promotional exam when it relied on the rules of statutory interpretation and the opinion of the City Solicitor. |
|
2020-0819
|
State of Ohio
v.
Clarence Leyh
|
OPEN
|
9/1/2020
| In order to ensure that an appellant who has been convicted of a felony offense has a meaningful right to appeal, a district court must grant an App.R. 26(B) application to reopen when there are one or more colorable issues identified in that application, and prior appellate counsel failed to ensure that a complete record—including all relevant transcripts—was made for appellate review. |
|
2020-0773
|
Harry A. Fonzi, III and Linda Grimes
v.
Gary D. Brown and Eclipse Resource I, LP
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
9/1/2020
| Proposition of Law No. 1: Sufficient service by publication of the R.C. 5301.56(E)(1) notice does not require a Landowner to determine that service by certified mail, return receipt requested, is impossible to complete by searching for the names and addresses of the mineral holders outside the land records of the county in which the land is located |
|
2020-0773
|
Harry A. Fonzi, III and Linda Grimes
v.
Gary D. Brown and Eclipse Resource I, LP
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
9/1/2020
| Proposition of Law No. 2: In order to set aside the evidentiary bar in R.C. 5301.56(H)(2) that arises when the county recorder memorializes the record on which a mineral interest is based, the former holder of a mineral interest has the burden of establishing that service of the R.C. 5301.56(E)(1) notice was insufficient. |
|
2020-0773
|
Harry A. Fonzi, III and Linda Grimes
v.
Gary D. Brown and Eclipse Resource I, LP
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
9/1/2020
| Proposition of Law No. 3: A former holder cannot establish that service by publication of the R.C. 5301.56(E)(1) notice was insufficient without showing that, with additional efforts by the Landowner, service by certified mail, return receipt requested, would have been possible to complete |
|
2020-0773
|
Harry A. Fonzi, III and Linda Grimes
v.
Gary D. Brown and Eclipse Resource I, LP
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
9/1/2020
| Proposition of Law No. 4: If a Landowner files an action to quiet title to a mineral interest under the DMA, such mineral interest is abandoned and vested in the Landowner if the
requirements of R.C. 5301.56(E) are satisfied and none of R.C. 5301.56(B)(1) through (3) apply |
|
2020-0761
|
Julia A. Cain, et al.
v.
Diana Burrett Horn, et al.
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
9/1/2020
| Proposition of Law No. I
(Do both the Marketable Title Act ("MTA'') and the Dormant
Mineral Act ("DMA") quiet title to severed mineral interests or do the two statutes conflict and
the DMA provides the exclusive remedy since it is a special provision pursuant to R.C. §1.51).
|
|
2020-0761
|
Julia A. Cain, et al.
v.
Diana Burrett Horn, et al.
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
9/1/2020
| Proposition of Law No. II
(The Court of Appeals erred in its application of the Marketable
Title Act by ignoring O.R.C. 5301.5l(B))
|
|
2020-0751
|
Russell Johnson
v.
David Craig Stachel, M.D.
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
9/1/2020
| Proposition ofl:aw Ne.l: The reversal saving statute, R.C. 2305. 1 9, does not allow
actions to survive beyond expiration of the statute of repose unless expressly
incorporated in the statute of repose |
|