| Case No. | Case Caption | Case Status | Date
Accepted | Case Issue |
|
2014-0804
|
Hans Michael Corban
v.
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., et al.
|
OPEN
|
7/23/2014
| 1. Does the 2006 version or the 1989 version of the ODMA apply to claims asserted after 2006 alleging that the rights to oil, gas, and other minerals automatically vested in the surface land holder prior to the 2006 amendments as a result of abandonment? |
|
2014-0804
|
Hans Michael Corban
v.
Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., et al.
|
OPEN
|
7/23/2014
| 2. Is the payment of a delay rental during the primary term of an oil and gas lease a title transaction and "savings event" under the ODMA? |
|
2014-0735
|
C.K.
v.
State of Ohio
|
OPEN
|
7/23/2014
| Proposition of Law No. I :
Under R.C. 2743.48(A)(4), a claimant must prove no further criminal prosecution can be brought for any act associated with his or her conviction. A claimant whose criminal case remains open, under investigation and in which the criminal statute of limitations has not expired, is unable to satisfy R.C. 2743.48(A)(4).
|
|
2014-0735
|
C.K.
v.
State of Ohio
|
OPEN
|
7/23/2014
| Proposition of Law No. II:
Under R.C. 2743.48(A)(4), contemporaneous criminal conduct arising out of the offense for which the claimant was originally charged bars a later action for wrongful imprisonment. Gover v. State, 67 Ohio St.3d 93 (1993).
|
|
2014-0708
|
Philip Laboy et al.
v.
Grange Indemnity Insurance Co., et al.
|
OPEN
|
7/23/2014
| Proposition of Law No. I: An Insurer Does Not Breach An Obligation To Pay Negotiated Rates For Medical Care When It Has No Contractual Right To Pay Those Rates.
|
|
2014-0708
|
Philip Laboy et al.
v.
Grange Indemnity Insurance Co., et al.
|
OPEN
|
7/23/2014
| Proposition of Law No. II: When A Contract Is Found To Be Unambiguous, It Is Error To Order Further Fact Finding About Its Meaning.
|
|
2014-0688
|
Jill L. Morris
v.
Michael D. Morris
|
OPEN
|
6/25/2014
| Does a trial court have jurisdiction under Civ.R. 60(B) to vacate or modify an award of spousal support in a decree of divorce or dissolution where the decree does not contain a reservation of jurisdiction to modify the award of spousal support pursuant to R.C. 3105.18(E)? |
|
2014-0674
|
State of Ohio
v.
David M. Anderson
|
OPEN
|
6/25/2014
| If a defendant is sentenced to prison for a term of incarceration, does the trial court have the authority to issue against the defendant, a "no contact" order with the victim? |
|
2014-0636
|
Sam Jodka
v.
City of Cleveland, Ohio et al.
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
7/9/2014
| Proposition of Law No. 1: Neither R.C. 1901.20 nor Ohio Constitution Article IV, 1 are offended when a home rule municipality enacts, by ordinance, a civil administrative process for photo enforcement of speed and red light violations. |
|
2014-0636
|
Sam Jodka
v.
City of Cleveland, Ohio et al.
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
7/9/2014
| Proposition of Law No. 2: R.C. 1.901.20 does not confer exclusive jurisdiction over civil administrative violations of municipal codes to municipal courts. |
|