| Case No. | Case Caption | Case Status | Date
Accepted | Case Issue |
|
2019-1674
|
State of Ohio
v.
Ryan Turner
|
OPEN
|
1/22/2020
| “Does an officer have reasonable and articulable suspicion to conduct a traffic stop of a motor vehicle for a marked lanes violation under R.C. 4511.33(A)(1) when the officer observes the tires of a vehicle driving on, but not across a marked line?” |
|
2019-1646
|
State of Ohio
v.
Carl Adams
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
1/21/2020
| Proposition of Law I:
A trial court must demonstrate on the record that it has determined that the sentence imposed utilizes the minimum sanctions necessary to accomplish the goals of sentencing without unnecessarily burdening governmental resources. |
|
2019-1510
|
State of Ohio
v.
Samuel Reed, Jr.
|
OPEN
|
1/21/2020
| Proposition of Law 1: The void-sentence doctrine does not
require that a sentence precisely track the statutory language
set forth by statute. |
|
2019-1498
|
Rayco Manufacturing, Inc.
v.
Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & Gambel, a Professional Law Corporation, et al.
|
OPEN
|
1/21/2020
| Proposition of Law No. I: The American Rule requires that each party pay its own attorney
fees unless the parties agreed otherwise by contract, a statute provides for fee shifting, or a
party acted in bad faith |
|
2019-1498
|
Rayco Manufacturing, Inc.
v.
Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & Gambel, a Professional Law Corporation, et al.
|
OPEN
|
1/21/2020
| Proposition of Law No. II: Compensatory damages for breach of contract do not include
attorney fees. |
|
2019-1498
|
Rayco Manufacturing, Inc.
v.
Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & Gambel, a Professional Law Corporation, et al.
|
OPEN
|
1/21/2020
| Proposition of Law No. III: Attorney fees incurred to prosecute a motion to enforce a
settlement agreement constitute litigation expenses rather than damages. |
|
2019-1498
|
Rayco Manufacturing, Inc.
v.
Murphy, Rogers, Sloss & Gambel, a Professional Law Corporation, et al.
|
OPEN
|
1/21/2020
| Proposition of Law No. IV: Where a party seeks attorney fees as a form of compensatory
damages, such damages must be determined by the fact finder based upon the evidence
presented at trial. |
|
2019-1494
|
Wayne L. West, et al.
v.
C. J. Bode, et al.
|
OPEN
|
1/21/2020
| PROPOSITION OF LAW N0. 1:
The specific statute being the Ohio Dormant Mineral Act O.R.C. Section 5301.56
supersedes and controls over the Ohio Marketable Title Act being a general statute O.R.C.
5301.47, et seq. and the two are in conflict as shown herein. |
|
2019-1485
|
In Re: S.M. [and] H.M., Dependent Child
|
OPEN
(Held)
|
1/21/2020
| Proposition of Law No. I: An Agency should only be able to file
for permanent custody under O.R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(d) once there
have been twenty-two-consecutive (22) moths of agency involvement |
|
2019-1481
|
Andrew Welsh-Huggins
v.
Office of the Prosecuting Attorney, Jefferson County, Ohio
|
OPEN
|
1/21/2020
| Appellant’s Proposition of Law No. 1
A public office must produce competent, admissible evidence to support an
assertion of an exception to the Public Records Act. |
|