Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 116 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re M.P.R. CA2015-11-200, CA2015-11-201, CA2015-11-202Although juvenile court did not err in allocating confinement credit to a dismissed complaint pursuant to R.C. 2152.18(B), the court erred in allocating more than 90 days of confinement-time to the dismissed complaint. HendricksonButler 5/23/2016 5/23/2016 2016-Ohio-3107
State v. Rarden CA2015-12-214The trial court properly denied the defendant's motion to void his 2007 prison sentence where the defendant's claim his sentence was void because the jury verdict form did not comply with R.C. 2945.75(A)(2), was barred under the doctrine of res judicata. M. PowellButler 5/23/2016 5/23/2016 2016-Ohio-3108
State v. Latimore CA2015-09-175Appellant's conviction of voyeurism pursuant to a local municipal ordinance that mirrors R.C. 2907.08(D) was supported by the sufficiency and weight of the evidence where the evidence showed appellant placed his smartphone in the bathroom of his home to secretly or surreptitiously record his girlfriend's minor daughter under or through her clothing for the purpose of viewing the minor's body or undergarments.RinglandButler 5/16/2016 5/16/2016 2016-Ohio-2989
Bank of New York Mellon v. Maxfield CA2016-01-004The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that service was proper where appellants failed to rebut the presumption of proper service where they only offered self-serving affidavits denying that they were in the state when service was said to have been perfected.PiperButler 5/16/2016 5/16/2016 2016-Ohio-2990
State v. Hampton CA2015-09-075The trial court did not err by failing to merge his nine convictions for misuse of a credit card where the record established that they were not allied offenses of similar import for each of the nine offenses were committed separately in separate transactions through the use of two separate credit cards with three separate retailers all of which created a separate and identifiable harm to the victim.S. PowellClermont 5/16/2016 5/16/2016 2016-Ohio-2991
In re A.A. CA2015-12-098The juvenile court's decision finding it was in a child's best interest to grant permanent custody of the child to a children's services agency was supported by sufficient, credible evidence and otherwise not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the child's parents, who previously had their parental rights to the child's brother involuntarily terminated, suffered from significant substance abuse problems, a lack of financial resources, and had no permanent housing.S. PowellClermont 5/16/2016 5/16/2016 2016-Ohio-2992
In re A.P. CA2015-12-023Anders no error.Per CuriamFayette 5/16/2016 5/16/2016 2016-Ohio-2993
Phillips v. McCarthy CA2015-08-017Trial court properly awarded summary judgment to state agency where Ohio estate recovery laws permit the state to pursue a lien to recoup Medicaid benefits in an amount representing the value of a life estate held by the recipient upon death. RinglandPreble 5/16/2016 5/16/2016 2016-Ohio-2994
State v. Ahlers CA2015-06-100Trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences for defendant's two gross sexual imposition convictions when court made required findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and the record supports those findings. RinglandButler 5/9/2016 5/9/2016 2016-Ohio-2890
In re A.B. CA2015-06-104Trial court did not abuse its discretion in terminating maternal grandmother's and uncle's visitation where the court evaluated the relevant statutory factors under R.C. 3109.051(D), acknowledged Mother's concerns and wishes about continuing visitation with appellants, and gave special weight to Mother's wishes. HendricksonButler 5/9/2016 5/9/2016 2016-Ohio-2891
12345678910...>>