Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 49 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Southern v. Scheu 17-17-16The transfer of juvenile cases is generally discretionary unless the movant demonstrates that a proceeding involving the juvenile child has commenced in another court.WillamowskiShelby 4/16/2018 4/16/2018 2018-Ohio-1440
Echemann v. Echemann 17-17-15The trial court abused its discretion by granting plaintiff-appellee's motion for relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B).PrestonShelby 4/16/2018 4/16/2018 2018-Ohio-1441
Salmons v. Salmons 2-17-20Trial court did not err when it denied the motion to vacate the final judgment due to lack of jurisdiction over a defendant when the evidence shows there was personal jurisdiction.WillamowskiAuglaize 4/16/2018 4/16/2018 2018-Ohio-1442
Santomieri v. Mangen 2-17-05The trial court did not err in enforcing promissory note against defendant-appellant because the trial court's conclusion that there was consideration for the promissory note is not against the manifest weight of the evidence.PrestonAuglaize 4/16/2018 4/16/2018 2018-Ohio-1443
State v. Smith 1-17-50Miranda warnings must reasonably convey the rights of a suspect. The police may search voluntarily abandoned property. At a minimum, reasonable suspicion is required to effect a traffic stop.WillamowskiAllen 4/16/2018 4/16/2018 2018-Ohio-1444
Tharp v. Whirlpool 9-17-41Trial court erred in granting summary judgment to employer where, at the very least, evidence was in conflict.ShawMarion 4/9/2018 4/9/2018 2018-Ohio-1344
State v. Hill 7-17-07The trial court substantially complied with Crim.R. 11(E) when it accepted Appellant's guilty plea to a petty offense. Due to the indicators in the record that a Notary Public was present at the time the complaint was executed but failed to sign the document, the case is remanded for a hearing to determine whether the complaint was sworn to under oath in the presence of someone authorized to administer an oath as required by Crim.R. 3.ShawHenry 4/9/2018 4/9/2018 2018-Ohio-1345
State v. Parsons 7-17-06The trial court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the defendant-appellant's petition for post-conviction relief because there is no judgment from which the defendant-appellant can seek post-conviction relief.PrestonHenry 4/9/2018 4/9/2018 2018-Ohio-1346
State v. Valladares 1-17-49Appellant's convictions for domestic violence and assault were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant failed to establish his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. There was no evidence in the record that the appointment of the Acting Judge to the case was improper. ShawAllen 4/2/2018 4/2/2018 2018-Ohio-1250
McBride v. Butler 3-17-20The trial court did not err in granting the insurance company's motion for summary judgment because the primary assumption of the risk doctrine barred plaintiff's recovery for injuries sustained as a result of an ATV accident. ShawCrawford 4/2/2018 4/2/2018 2018-Ohio-1251