Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the full-text search.
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Decided?
County:   What is Decided?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Decided?
Topics and Issues:   What is Decided?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 88 rows. Rows per page: 
123456789
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Tretola v. Tretola 8-14-24Defendant-Appellant, Robert Tretola ("Robert"), pro se, appeals the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Logan County, Family Court-Domestic Relations Division, which distributed proceeds of the sale of the parties' marital home and found Robert in contempt of court. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.RogersLogan 5/26/2015 5/26/2015 2015-Ohio-1999
State v. Coleman 1-15-08Appellant's motion properly characterized as petition for post-conviction relief, and it was properly denied on the basis of res judicata. It was also untimely.ShawAllen 5/18/2015 5/18/2015 2015-Ohio-1883
State v. Fittro 9-14-19Trial court did not err in denying the OVI defendant's motion to suppress where the initial stop and questioning of the defendant were justified; the HGN test was performed in substantial compliance with NHTSA standards; the arrest was justified by probable cause under the totality of the circumstances approach; the State substantially complied with the necessary procedures when performing the breath alcohol test; and the State satisfied its burden of proof at the suppression hearing.WillamowskiMarion 5/18/2015 5/18/2015 2015-Ohio-1884
State v. Haskell 13-14-42Defendant has not established that his counsel was ineffective so as to result in the defendant's plea not being voluntary or intelligent and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling the defendant's motion to withdraw the guilty plea.WillamowskiSeneca 5/18/2015 5/18/2015 2015-Ohio-1885
State v. Collins 4-14-14; 4-14-15; 4-14-16The trial court did not err in finding that defendant's pleas were knowing and voluntary and the trial counsel was not ineffective for failure to move to withdraw his guilty pleas. By pleading guilty Defendant waived his right to raise on appeal the propriety of the trial court's suppression ruling.WillamowskiDefiance 5/18/2015 5/18/2015 2015-Ohio-1886
State v. McGuire 1-13-47Defendant-Appellant, Charles McGuire, appeals the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Allen County convicting him of murder, aggravated burglary, and aggravated robbery and sentencing him to 25 years to life in prison. On appeal, McGuire argues that the trial court erred by: (1) entering verdicts that were not supported by sufficient evidence; (2) entering verdicts that were against the manifest weight of the evidence; and (3) imposing a mandatory sentence for his aggravated robbery conviction. McGuire also claims that the State engaged in prosecutorial misconduct. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part the trial court's judgment.RogersAllen 5/18/2015 5/18/2015 2015-Ohio-1887
Gunka v. Gunka 5-14-31The trial court did not err in adopting the magistrate's recommendation of a downward deviation of child support.ShawHancock 5/18/2015 5/18/2015 2015-Ohio-1888
State v. Bower 17-14-14The trial court did not err in defining the sexual-conduct element of rape in its instruction to the jury. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing testimony because it was admissible under Evid.R. 403(A).PrestonShelby 5/18/2015 5/18/2015 2015-Ohio-1889
State v. Markley 9-14-39Defendant-appellant's felonious assault conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not err in the admission of evidence. The defendant-appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to a "reenactment," to markings placed at the scene for a jury view, to a statement of a law enforcement officer that questioned the defendant-appellant regarding ricochet, or for failing to request an allocation of funds for an expert witness.PrestonMarion 5/18/2015 5/18/2015 2015-Ohio-1890
State v. Laurence 3-14-05Defendant-Appellant, Jacob Laurence, appeals the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford County convicting him of one count of aggravated robbery. On appeal, Laurence argues that the trial court erred by entering a guilty verdict that was not supported by sufficient evidence. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. RogersCrawford 5/18/2015 5/18/2015 2015-Ohio-1891
123456789