Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 270 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Bank of New York Mellon v. Belville L-16-1312This is an appeal from a default judgment while a motion for leave to file an answer instanter was pending.OsowikLucas 9/22/2017 9/22/2017 2017-Ohio-7772
In re B.K. L-17-1082termination of parental rights, R.C. 2151.414(E), substance abuse, failure to complete intensive outpatient treatment, heroin, manifest weight, Anders v. California, appointed counsel, motion to withdrawJensenLucas 9/22/2017 9/22/2017 2017-Ohio-7773
Delp v. Delp L-16-1242The probate court did not abuse its discretion by granting beneficiaries' motion to remove the trustee under R.C. 5807.06, where appellant/trustee breached the trust duties and removal was in the best interest of the trust beneficiaries. Final, appealable order; standard of review.PietrykowskiLucas 9/22/2017 9/22/2017 2017-Ohio-7774
State v. Johnson L-16-1268Trial court did not err in imposing agreed-upon sentence where the sentence is authorized by law. Appellant's guilty plea was knowing and voluntary under Crim.R. 11 where the trial court informed appellant of his constitutional and non-constitutional rights prior to accepting the plea.JensenLucas 9/22/2017 9/22/2017 2017-Ohio-7775
State v. Kolodzaike WD-16-049, WD-16-050Trial court did not abuse its discretion in appellant's misdemeanor sentence. Judgment affirmed.OsowikWood 9/22/2017 9/22/2017 2017-Ohio-7776
Shaw v. Shaw L-16-1271Trial court did not err in denying appellant's Civ.R. 60(B) motion filed without supporting evidence eight years after the final divorce decree was issued. Judgment affirmed.OsowikLucas 9/22/2017 9/22/2017 2017-Ohio-7777
Williams v. Chrysler First Fin. Servs. Co. L-17-1009Trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing plaintiff's request to provide the jury with a dual causation instruction where the medical evidence did not point to more than one proximate cause of plaintiff's rotator cuff tear.MayleLucas 9/22/2017 9/22/2017 2017-Ohio-7778
Miller v. Miller S-16-027When a transaction benefits a family member, a gift is presumed, and the party arguing that the subject of such a transaction was not a gift and should, therefore, be classified as separate property has the burden of establishing the transaction was not a gift.WillamowskiSandusky 9/15/2017 9/15/2017 2017-Ohio-7646
State v. Arnold L-16-1261Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law where the trial court indicated its consideration of the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11 and the relevant sentencing factors under R.C. 2929.12 in its sentencing entry, and the term was within the statutory limits under R.C. 2929.14.JensenLucas 9/15/2017 9/15/2017 2017-Ohio-7644
Tillimon v. Fench L-17-1056The Toledo Municipal Court does not have authority to declare, sua sponte or otherwise, a party a vexatious litigator. Civ.R. 45 and 69, read in conjunction with one another, allow for a party to issue a subpoena through counsel or the court in an effort to aid in the execution of a judgment.SingerLucas 9/15/2017 9/15/2017 2017-Ohio-7647