Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 319 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Alexander WD-17-015Postconviction relief petition untimely; res judicata and waiver bar a claim of voidable sentence.PietrykowskiWood 11/9/2017 11/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8506
Estate of Brummitt v. Ohio Mut. Ins. Group E-17-014Trial court properly granted summary judgment. Notice of voluntary dismissal after trial commenced on bifurcated claims constitutes a dismissal on the merits pursuant to Civ.R. 41(B)(3).SingerErie 11/9/2017 11/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8507
In re J.P. L-17-1100; L-17-1101Trial court properly granted permanent custody of minor children to Lucas County Children ServicesOsowikLucas 11/9/2017 11/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8508
McDonald v. Rodriguez S-16-042Trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding appellant in contempt for failing to obtain refinancing of the parties' marital residence upon dissolution of the marriage, where the court's order required appellant to seek such refinancing in good faith and appellant failed to act in good faith.JensenSandusky 11/9/2017 11/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8509
Patel v. Sandusky City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. E-17-019Trial court erred in denying appellant's Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from an improper summary judgment ruling. The non-moving party was not served or notified of the filing and was denied any opportunity to oppose it. Judgment reversed and remanded.OsowikErie 11/9/2017 11/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8510
State v. Roach L-16-1303Trial court abused its discretion in granting the victim's restitution motion. Judgment reversed.OsowikLucas 11/9/2017 11/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8511
State v. Abdugheneima L-17-1013In bench trial on charges of violating protection order, court committed no error in failing to appoint translator, and counsel was not ineffective for failing to request one, where appellant demonstrated ability to readily understand and communicate in English and meaningfully participated at trial. Evidence was sufficient to support conviction, and conviction was not against manifest weight of evidence where conviction resulted not from language barrier, but because court did not believe appellant.MayleLucas 11/3/2017 11/3/2017 2017-Ohio-8423
State v. Burnette L-16-1272, L-16-1273The trial court complied with Crim.R. 11(C) before accepting appellant's pleas. The trial court was not required to inform appellant of the elements of each charge against him to ensure that appellant understood the nature of his crimes, and the totality of the circumstances shows that appellant understood the nature of his crimes. Appellant's sentence is not contrary to law.MayleLucas 11/3/2017 11/3/2017 2017-Ohio-8424
Goodell v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. WD-16-071Award of summary judgment to appellee allowing coverage under an auto policy supported by the facts and law. SingerWood 11/3/2017 11/3/2017 2017-Ohio-8425
State v. Johnson WM-17-004Trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant's request for a continuance where the request would create a significant delay in a minor misdemeanor case and the trial court had granted appellant's prior request for a continuance.JensenWilliams 10/27/2017 10/27/2017 2017-Ohio-8340