Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the full-text search.
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Decided?
County:   What is Decided?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Decided?
Topics and Issues:   What is Decided?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 240 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Phipps 14AP-545Trial court abused its discretion by denying appellant's postconviction relief petition without a hearing. Appellant presented sufficient operative facts to establish substantive grounds for relief on his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel based on assertions that his trial counsel improperly advised him regarding the mandatory jail term under his guilty plea and failed to present any mitigating evidence at sentencing.DorrianFranklin 7/30/2015 7/30/2015 2015-Ohio-3042
Temponeras v. Ohio State Med. Bd. 14AP-970Trial court did not err when it affirmed the decision of the state medical board.BrownFranklin 7/30/2015 7/30/2015 2015-Ohio-3043
WFAL Constr. v. Dir., Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs. 14AP-985Judgment affirmed. When filing an administrative appeal pursuant to R.C. 4141.26, strict compliance with the statute is necessary. Failure to name the proper party to the appeal until after the statutorily prescribed time frame, deprives the trial court of subject-matter jurisdiction.HortonFranklin 7/30/2015 7/30/2015 2015-Ohio-3044
State v. McCord 15AP-90Trial court judge did not have the right to send defendant to prison, given the mandates of R.C. 2929.13(B)(1).TyackFranklin 7/30/2015 7/30/2015 2015-Ohio-3045
157 Holdings, L.L.C. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. 15AP-95Bar owner did not have the right to prevent law enforcement from entering the permit premises.TyackFranklin 7/30/2015 7/30/2015 2015-Ohio-3046
State ex rel. Vinson v. Indus. Comm. 14AP-450Magistrate did not err by concluding that relator failed to demonstrate that the commission abused its discretion. Magistrate decided that case was distinguishable from precedent cited by relator, thus effectively concluding that some evidence supported the commission's decision. The decision will not be overturned as an abuse of discretion based on other factors that relator asserts make her case analogous to the cited precedent.DorrianFranklin 7/28/2015 7/28/2015 2015-Ohio-3006
State v. Mobarak 14AP-517Trial court erred when it found appellant quilty of possessing and trafficking in controlled substance analogs.BrownFranklin 7/28/2015 7/28/2015 2015-Ohio-3007
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Goldsmith 14AP-783The trial court did not err when it granted summary judgment and entered a judgment in foreclose.BrownFranklin 7/28/2015 7/28/2015 2015-Ohio-3008
Third Fed. S. & L. Assn. of Cleveland v. Strong 14AP-902Trial court abused its discretion in disbursing the excess proceeds from a foreclosure sale to the prior homeowner-mortgagor ahead of mortgagee's junior lien where mortgagee asserted its right to surplus proceeds both in an answer to the foreclosure complaint and in an independent motion for excess process prior to distribution, and equitable principles supported review of evidence of mortgagee's entitlement of surplus ahead of mortgagor. Judgment reversed and cause remanded to hold an evidentiary hearing on mortgagee's motion.SadlerFranklin 7/28/2015 7/28/2015 2015-Ohio-3009
Jeff Schmitt Chevrolet, Ltd. v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs. 14AP-917Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in affirming the Unemployment Compensation Review Commission's determination that Jeff Schmidt Chevrolet was a successor-in-interest to a former car dealership, as Jeff Schmidt Chevrolet acquired all of the assets which were integral to the operation of a car dealership from the former dealership. HortonFranklin 7/28/2015 7/28/2015 2015-Ohio-3010
12345678910...>>