Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the full-text search.
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Decided?
County:   What is Decided?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Decided?
Topics and Issues:   What is Decided?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 41 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Smith 13AP-973No reversible error was presented by the ten assigned errors. Strong evidence supported the convictions for multiple armed robberies. Defense counsel's personal problems did not prevent him from rendering effective assistance of counsel.TyackFranklin 3/3/2015 3/3/2015 2015-Ohio-735
State ex rel. Collins v. Plageman 14AP-186Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in denying temporary total disability compensation where claimant did not establish his disability was causally related to his industrial injury.Luper SchusterFranklin 3/3/2015 3/3/2015 2015-Ohio-736
State ex rel. Sevilla v. Cocroft 14AP-479Writ of mandamus dismissed.BrownFranklin 3/3/2015 3/3/2015 2015-Ohio-737
State v. Woodruff 14AP-485Pursuant to R.C. 2929.18(A)(1), the trial court erred by failing to hold a hearing on restitution in response to appellant's objection.DorrianFranklin 3/3/2015 3/3/2015 2015-Ohio-738
State v. W.R. 14AP-487The sufficiency of the evidence and the manifest weight of the evidence support W.R.'s convictions of sexual battery and unlawful sexual conduct with a minor.Luper SchusterFranklin 3/3/2015 3/3/2015 2015-Ohio-739
TPI Asset Mgt., L.L.C. v. Ealey 14AP-525Trial court's failure to order court costs and title insurance costs in a foreclosure action was error.TyackFranklin 3/3/2015 3/3/2015 2015-Ohio-740
Selective Ins. Co. of Am. v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. 14AP-588Surety, who had paid out under a bond, sought recovery from Ohio Dept. of Rehabilitation and Correction because ODRC had failed to detain funds pursuant to R.C 1311.28 after a subcontractor had filed a mechanic's lien. The Court of Claims granted summary judgment in favor of surety under the common law theory of equitable subrogation. Judgment affirmed.TyackFranklin 3/3/2015 3/3/2015 2015-Ohio-741
State ex rel. Wike v. Indus. Comm. 14AP-213Relator's request for writ of mandamus denied; some evidence supported commission's determination that relator's ability to walk with a brace precludes her from recovering a scheduled loss award for loss of use of her left leg.KlattFranklin 2/26/2015 2/26/2015 2015-Ohio-681
State v. Thompson 14AP-488Defendant's convictions for aggravated robbery, robbery and attendant firearm specifications were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.BryantFranklin 2/24/2015 2/24/2015 2015-Ohio-655
Nkanginieme v. Ohio Dept. of Medicaid 14AP-596Pursuant to R.C. 5164.38(C), (D), and (E), the Ohio Department of Medicaid's suspension of a Medicaid provider agreement and payments is not subject to an R.C. 119.12 administrative appeal where the suspension is based on "credible allegations of fraud." An appeal improperly brought "pursuant to Chapter 119" deprives the common pleas court of subject-matter jurisdiction over the merits of the case, rendering due process arguments moot. The judgment of the court of common pleas dismissing the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is affirmed.SadlerFranklin 2/24/2015 2/24/2015 2015-Ohio-656