Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the full-text search.
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Decided?
County:   What is Decided?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Decided?
Topics and Issues:   What is Decided?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 244 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Abdullah CA2015-02-015Complicity to Robbery; Maximum Sentence; Seriousness and Recidivism Factors; R.C. 2929.11; Purposes and Principles of Sentencing; R.C. 2929.12; The trial court's decision sentencing appellant to the maximum term of three years in prison following his guilty plea to complicity to robbery was proper given that the trial court considered the purposes and principles of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, balanced the seriousness and recidivism factors in R.C. 2929.12, properly applied postrelease control, and sentenced appellant within the permissible statutory range.S. PowellButler 8/31/2015 8/31/2015 2015-Ohio-3521
Lebanon v. Ballinger CA2014-08-107Violation of a city's zoning code; inappropriate fencing; failure to abide by court order to remove fencing; contempt finding supported by the record; issue of selective or discriminatory prosecution not properly pled or raised; failure to develop assigned errors; App.R. 16(A)(7); App.R. 12(A)(2).HendricksonWarren 8/31/2015 8/31/2015 2015-Ohio-3522
State v. Barnes CA2015-01-005Moot; jail-time credit; released from prison. Appeal dismissed as moot where appellant had been released from prison at the time of his appeal. There was no relief that could be provided regarding appellant's challenge to the calculation of jail-time credit.PiperWarren 8/31/2015 8/31/2015 2015-Ohio-3523
State v. Eldridge CA2015-02-013OVI; R.C. 4511.10(A)(1)(a); Insufficient Evidence; Inventory Search; Waived.RinglandWarren 8/31/2015 8/31/2015 2015-Ohio-3524
State v. Curtis CA2015-02-007Sentencing; Postrelease Control; Res Judicata.PiperBrown 8/24/2015 8/24/2015 2015-Ohio-3404
State v. Halsey CA2014-10-211Tier III sex offender classification; R.C. 2929.19(B)(3)(a)(ii); appellant properly notified of his Tier III sex offender classification at sentencing hearing; sentencing entry's failure to state appellant was a Tier III sex offender; motion to vacate classification filed two years after appellant successfully completed his community control and trial court filed an entry terminating his case; motion to vacate properly denied where there was nothing to vacate.PowellButler 8/24/2015 8/24/2015 2015-Ohio-3405
State v. Osie CA2014-10-222Postconviction Relief; Capital; Mitigation; Discovery; Transcript; Neurological Impairment; Expert; Funds; Sentencing; Victim's Family.RinglandButler 8/24/2015 8/24/2015 2015-Ohio-3406
State v. Brown CA2014-12-257Manifest weight; sufficiency of the evidence; circumstantial evidence; constructive possession; possession of drugsPowellButler 8/24/2015 8/24/2015 2015-Ohio-3407
State v. Burkhart CA2015-01-004Operating a Vehicle Under the Influence (OVI); Repeat OVI Offender Specification; Equal Protection Clause; R.C. 4511.19 and R.C. 2941.1413: Repeat OVI offender specification in R.C. 2941.1413 does not violate the Equal Protection Clauses of the United States Constitution or the Ohio Constitution.PiperClermont 8/24/2015 8/24/2015 2015-Ohio-3409
In re M.C. CA2014-12-264The juvenile court's inadvertent addition of the general parenting guidelines was a clerical mistake that should have been corrected by the juvenile court where the record is clear that the parties mediated a visitation agreement, and the court's attachment of the guidelines was inadvertent. PiperButler 8/24/2015 8/24/2015 2015-Ohio-3408