Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 12 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Fetters v. Duff 10-17-14Plaintiff-appellant had standing under R.C. 1337.36 to file a complaint requesting an accounting from a deceased principal's attorney-in-fact. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing plaintiff-appellant's complaint for an accounting.PrestonMercer 2/12/2018 2/12/2018 2018-Ohio-542
State v. McMahon 3-17-113Trial court erred by failing to hold a hearing after appellant filed a petition to have his record sealed pursuant to R.C. 2953.31 and 2953.32 and the statute required that a hearing be set.WillamowskiCrawford 2/12/2018 2/12/2018 2018-Ohio-543
Cintas Corp. v. Findlay Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram, Inc. 5-17-14The trial court did not err by determining that a contract existed between the Appellant and the Appellee. Further, the liquidated damages clause in the contract was not a penalty and the trial court's calculation of damages was supported by competent and credible evidence. Judgment affirmed.ZimmermanHancock 2/5/2018 2/5/2018 2018-Ohio-455
State v. Taflinger 8-17-20Subject to statutory exceptions specified in R.C. 2929.41(B)(3), a trial court may not impose a sentence for a misdemeanor consecutively to a sentence for a felony. Further, in order to impose consecutive sentences, the trial court must make findings, specified in R.C. 2929.14, at the sentencing hearing and must incorporate these findings into its judgment entry.WillamowskiLogan 2/5/2018 2/5/2018 2018-Ohio-456
In re J.T. 11-17-03R.C. 2907.05(A)(4), gross sexual imposition, is not unconstitutional as applied to a child under the age of 13 who engaged in sexual contact with another child under the age of 13 where competent and credible evidence exists in the record to support the mens rea of purpose. Further, appellant was not a member of a protected class (i.e. child under 13) where competent and credible evidence exists to differentiate him from the victim through proof of sexual arousal or gratification. Judgment affirmed.ZimmermanPaulding 2/5/2018 2/5/2018 2018-Ohio-457
State v. Lester 11-17-05Sufficient evidence was presented to convict Lester of Speeding.ShawPaulding 2/5/2018 2/5/2018 2018-Ohio-458
State v. Soto 12-17-05Charges of Aggravated Murder and Murder are barred by double jeopardy.ShawPutnam 2/5/2018 2/5/2018 2018-Ohio-459
In re Adoption of H.W. 16-17-05, 16-07-06The trial court erred by concluding that it was without jurisdiction to consider the adoption petition.PrestonWyandot 2/5/2018 2/5/2018 2018-Ohio-460
State v. Dahms 13-17-23Appellant's arguments are barred by the doctrine of res judicata.ShawSeneca 1/29/2018 1/29/2018 2018-Ohio-349
State v. Born 6-17-13The trial court did not err in imposing Appellant's postrelease control sanction in accordance with R.C. 2929.191(C). ShawHardin 1/29/2018 1/29/2018 2018-Ohio-350